A kanban board shows work as cards moving through stages, left to right. It takes ten minutes to set one up and most teams still abandon theirs within a month. The difference is rarely the tool. It is whether the board tells the truth.
Start with the stages you already have
Do not design a process for the board. Write down what happens to a piece of work today, from the moment somebody asks for it to the moment it is finished, and make each real handover a column.
For most teams that is four: to do, in progress, in review and done. Add a column only when work genuinely waits there, such as "waiting on client". A column nobody can explain is a column cards go to die in.
Write cards somebody can act on
A good card names one outcome, has one owner and has a date if the date matters. "Website" is not a card. "Publish the pricing page" is.
Put the owner and the date on the front of the card, not inside it. The point of the board is that nobody has to open anything to see who is doing what.
Limit what is in progress
The most useful rule in kanban is the least popular: cap how many cards may sit in "in progress" at once. Two or three per person is plenty.
A limit forces the conversation that matters. When the column is full, the team finishes something or agrees what to stop, instead of quietly starting a tenth thing.
Keep it honest
A board is only worth looking at if it is current. Move the card when the work moves, not at the end of the week. Look at it together for ten minutes at a fixed time, starting from the right hand side: what is closest to done, and what is stopping it?
If cards keep stalling in one column, that column is your bottleneck. That is the board doing its job.
Doing this in TaskNow
In TaskNow the kanban view is the same board as the table, split by any status column. Drag a card to the next column and everyone on the board sees it move. Owners and dates sit on the front of every card, and the dashboard counts what is in each status without anybody building a report.